« When "Traitor" lurks in "Administrator" |
Main
| Poll: Why Do You Collect Logs? »
My poll on log collection have been a great success and now the results are in. Here is the link to the running totals as of now (the graphic snapshot from yesterday can be seen here). Let's review and discuss the findings after running it for slightly over a week.
- First, which of my expectations were NOT met? Well, I did expect that firewalls will be #1, not Linux/Unix servers. Admittedly, the difference is not so big, but I am impressed: Unix syslog still rocks the logging world :-)
- Second, the top source of collected logs is also the hardest to analyze due to its lack of structure. Nowadays I treat syslog from Unix/Linux as "broken English" and not as "data." It is a dog to parse (that is why we are trying to find something novel)
- Third, I was amazed that database logs were THAT high on the list. Wow! All the evangelizing seems to have worked out :-)
- Fourth, Windows server log collection is still in the dumps - but we need it! Go grab LASSO and dump those event logs into syslog without pesky agents. Easy!
- Firth, other Unix logs - what are those? We might never know what the respondents meant: still, I think that these are binary audit logs and other fine-grained audit logging. Indeed, many people starting to look at BSM audits and other "ugly ducklings" of logging.
- Sixth, web server logs are gold - everybody knows it. The poll confirms this as well: they are #2. Some fun analysis tips from me are coming soon.
Next poll coming soon! Thanks a lot for responding!
Possibly related posts:
Posted October 26, 2007 in Innovation , Log Management & Intelligence , LogMatters | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.loglogic.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/269